Over 58383
politifake

Michael Politics


IF I HAD A DOLLAR... - For every time that capitalism was blamed for problems caused by government, I'd be a fat filmmaker with a baseball hat.


TAGS: capitalism michael moore fatass socialist
Rating: 4.92/5

More politifakes by thatmfguy

RonaldReagan - April 5, 2015, 3:25 am
Magnificent. 5 stars. Sending this to my daughter-in-law. She's still a fan


Liberalism -




If Michael Brown, Eric Garner & Trayvon Martin had been killed in Afghanistan -


TAGS: michael brown eric garner trayvon martin obama holder sharpton jesse jackson farrakhan race baiters naacp afghanistan iraq war troops
Rating: 4.97/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

Thedge - December 12, 2014, 1:58 pm
Been a couple weeks, probably don't now. Just so the sleep well. 5L


Remember how white people rioted when OJ Simpson was acquitted of murder? -


TAGS: ferguson michael brown naacp
Rating: 4.85/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

crankyhead - December 5, 2014, 8:40 pm
Remember when OJ swore an oath to protect and serve the public? Yeah, me neither.


L IS FOR LOSER - Yes, he is one......




IF I HAD A DOLLAR - Every time a problem caused by government Was blamed on business I'd be a fat filmmaker in a ball cap




LIBERAL THEOLOGY - If you pay taxes, you fund war, therefore you cannot get into heaven. Obama's apostle Michael Moore teaches us this.




Liberal Logic -




Hey, Michael Moore... -




Getting What They Asked For & Receiving What They Deserve -


TAGS: baltimore black lives matter freddie gray ferguson effect police presence no justice no peace stephanie rawlings blake marilyn mosby al sharpton race baiters naacp grievance industry cpusa blacklivesmatter eric garner hands up dont shoot michael brown
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

MMessEnnBeeCee - June 2, 2015, 7:54 am
Try to figure out why people think a comment is written about them. I mentioned no names, but said some people had the IQ of a dead tree. Someone here decided it must be them that I'm talking about. Now try to figure out why they would think that. lol
guest818 - June 2, 2015, 4:39 am
EMMa, for someone incapable of getting their b***ons pushed, you sure get your b***ons pushed a lot.
rebeccaolsen - June 1, 2015, 6:30 pm
Of course. Because MMessEnnBeeEss WAS talking about me :) It just pushes his bu'ttons when people see right through him, and he gets so embarrassed about it that he tries to cover it up(and other things)by playing 'stupid' about it. Well, I buy 'that' :)
OTC - June 1, 2015, 5:55 pm
She must have "reasonably inferred" you were talking about her, despite "they" in the sentence
rebeccaolsen - May 31, 2015, 8:42 pm
But carry on, you are so cute when you fail troll. :)
rebeccaolsen - May 31, 2015, 8:41 pm
That is still p.ushing your b***ons hun? Aren't you supposed to be "ignoring" me, hun? (#76501) Using OTC to passive-aggressively respond to the things I say, this time "the great comment debate"(#76634,#76635)really doesn't fit the definition of ignoring
MMessEnnBeeCee - May 31, 2015, 6:15 pm
Have you ever noticed how they all claim to have degrees, yet can't even grasp how comments work. I think their degrees are in underwater basket weaving.
OTC - May 31, 2015, 5:16 pm
Liberals are such a joke, and they wonder why we laugh at them.


LIBERAL HYPOCRITE MICHAEL MOORE - While wailing on about the evils of capitalism he lives the lifestyle that only capitalism could bring




Michael Moore says all muslims are douche bags -




Scientific Consensus on Global Warming??? -


TAGS: global warming consensus climate change hoax scam farce michael crichton junk science green religion alarmists warmists greenies al gore ipcc agenda21
Rating: 4.69/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - April 25, 2015, 9:29 pm
I've seen worse, Ala 62039. Being fired for pointing out AGW junk science.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 6:19 pm
You're wrong again, "activist" scientists, not scientists. Activist scientists have been caught drawing conclusions before doing the research, its not that hard to follow along.
calron - April 25, 2015, 5:00 pm
What's really bad is that natural variability could be used to support AGW, but some shout denier whenever you bring it up as a cause for warming.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 4:48 pm
As long as it annoys Rebecca, it is worth it to me. X-D It's the only thing keeping me going, mate. :-) F*ck carrots and gum.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:48 pm
Like when Rush Limbaugh lied this week about the Duke study. The authors of that study actually came out against him because the political media does this all of the time. That is scientists up in arm over being exploited in a non-debate
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:46 pm
By now, it's common sense knowledge in the world of academia that climatology firmly supports the theory of MMCC. The scientific community is not at odds over this. It's the public that is on the fence. Talking about it too much distracts from the issue
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:43 pm
Don't really care about any of that. If or when the media is wrong about MMCC, doesn't change the fact that the science community is firmly behind MMCC in both consensus and findings.
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:39 pm
Roughly 1.59% of the abstracts reach the conclusion that he says the majority agrees with. That's not in the ballpark. If he chose a different standard to measure the consensus, he could have got the 97.1%.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:33 pm
the scientists will just get each other's back like some country club. That's absurd. That's not what peer review means. On this issue, there has been enough fact checking that this bias would've been revealed by the present.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:31 pm
It would appear Faux is talking about peer-reviewed journals about climate change, not the consensus. Roughly speaking, virtually all of them ARE behind the MMCC theory. OTC's problem is he thinks peer review is biased because
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:27 pm
Cook is guilty of being sloppy, not being debunked. Roughly speaking, he was in the ball park. Again you are splitting hairs hun. Peer review has caught it. It's just not a big enough issue to matter. Climatology isn't up in arms over this for good reason
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:24 pm
I've red a few and this is not necessary true. Take Cook's census for example. It reaches a conclusion that is debunked by Cook's own numbers rather than reaching the conclusion supported by the numbers. Peer review should catch it, but it still happens.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:34 pm
Like the past 2 years of unusual cool climate is suddenly "just weather". Anyways, have a good weekend and break that cig habit, you're more amusing nicotine free :-)
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:31 pm
*Sigh* Perhaps you missed my posts stating that I don't deny human impact (contributing), I'm fully aware of MMCO2 but I do deny it's the sole driver of current trends in CC. And I notice anything to the contrary of MMCC is not welcomed
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:23 am
Alrighty then. Off to start my weekend. A night of me designated driving for my friends while others get drunk :-/ WEEEEE! Anyhow, fun jousting with you mate. Let's do it again next week if the spirit moves us, OTC. Cheers. :-) Fox is off the air.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:20 am
P.S. Don't think I didn't notice you abandoning your cosmic ray Henrik denier theory. ;-) Is science like a crap shoot for you? One of these days do you just hope to roll the dice 'just right' and find a random link that will finally pay off? X-D
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
The only Quote from that article that matters - "It does not, the authors emphasize, change the evidence of human impact on global climate beginning in the 20th century." #PWNEDYOURSELF
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
Even you admit, in your game of pigeon chess, that they are not removing the human element. You're grasping for straws - everything else you said is irrelevant in light of that concession.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:10 am
http://phys.org/news/2014-08-global-temperature-conundrum-cooling-climate.html
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:08 am
Well even this states it doesn't. remove the human equation, but the climate models didn't predict a cooling and that has them confused, which is funny because not everything was used in the models because scientists didn't think it was significant
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:15 pm
...I think, sometimes, you are confusing the political conclusions drawn by the liberal crowd which I agree are conflated.However,the peer-reviewed journals simply say:MMCC is unequivocal.They do not endorse the dire predictions of Al Gore or the libs...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:13 pm
...in that sense, we've always been in agreement. The libs, as badly as the GOPers, have dragged the science dialogue into the political gutter. And the libs have their own denier issue to deal with -- the anti-vaccination movement...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:08 pm
...The scientists are just reporting their findings. How long and how bad MMCC will affect the planet is up for conjecture.All they can claim is it's happening and a serious issue.It's not meant to be a crystal ball about next years temps or Superbowl win
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:06 pm
P.S. Before you go down another rabbit hole, I can save you the trouble: all the consensus says about MMCC is that it is unequivocal.It doesnt claim to predict everything. It doesnt claim it will be the end of the world.The lib politicians are doing that
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 8:56 pm
Source? I think I'm sure about what you are speaking about. But with you, I can never be sure. ;-) Provide a citation, please. And yes, the MMCC debate ended more or less many years ago. It's not confusing for the scientists, just the quacks.
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:51 pm
If the debate on MMCC is over, then why is there a global temperature conundrum that scientists plan to address this fall? I thought it was settled.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:20 pm
...except Scientology. You can judge Scientology. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:19 pm
Scientology was created in the 20th century by a science fiction author. An awful science fiction author. Religion of any kind holds us back. But none of us has the right to judge the other - Be you Xtian, Jew, Muslim, Agnostic Atheist...etc
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:15 pm
I actually respect religion even if I don't believe in God. I just don't respect fundamentalism. If you want to pick on a religion of liberal geeks, pick on Scientology. It has "science" in the title, at least. It is a liberal tard fest. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:13 pm
The science on MMCC is simply a report on the findings. Whatever problem you have with the politics of it comes with your own philosophical problem with how science works, which a**umes a theocratic pov as the inverse since you are making this about faith
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:09 pm
And by "theocratic", what I mean by that is - again, it's revealed when you overplayed your hand with your philosophical problem with science: Science doesn't pretend to be infallible. That is what religion is for. Science isn't a religion for geeks.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:53 pm
No, becca. Coffee. Lots and lots of coffee :-/ They have Taco Bell Mountain Dew Baja Blast in the can now for a limited time! :-D Now I dont have to sneak my McDonald's cup into there and steal it. X-D I can get my caffeine fix from the convenience store.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:51 pm
You have such unreasonable distrust toward science,wildly a**uming political bias everywhere you can.Yet you haven't a skeptical bone in your body over secular Christian ideology,which is rife with politics? You have a theocratic agenda on MMCC, mate(2/2)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:41 pm
It proves you are more than a simple contrarian. It proves you are delusional, mate. :-/ Your problem isn't with MMCC. Your problem is with science, and how it works. And your issue with it is a purely philosophical one.(1/2)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:29 pm
You're actually on top of things for a change.Not that obliterating OTC's argument is rocket science.Regular science would do - something he doesnt comprehend.But a coherent argument from you,Faux? You must've remembered your nicotine gum this morning :)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:21 pm
"when the facts show it is wrong following a proper scientific inquiry,which already demonstrated human-induced CC was unequivocal." Finishing that sentence for you,denier :) Know you wanted to imply politics or bias was behind the rejection.Not today hun
OTC - April 24, 2015, 11:37 am
I didn't state that he disproved MMCC. But this does prove that research that finds reasons for CC other than humans is rejected.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:23 am
And how does your idiotic anecdotal observations about weather counter my thorough refutation of Henrik? The man YOU CITED as DISPROVING MMCC?? Oh yeah,it doesn't because you can't - hence this LAME red-herring, Im sorry, I meant 'attempt at sarcasm.' :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:14 am
lol...You can't be serious, mate...lolololol...Yeah, the scientist's evidence vs. your own two eyes. Well...I went to China last year and didn't fall off the Earth. Guess those flat Earthers were right! X-D Hmmmm?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:10 am
Let me guess, a tornado? GW! a hurricane? GW! a blizzard? GW! so this cooler than usual weather must be GW, right? isn't that what the consensus is?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:07 am
We're told 2014 was the h**test year on record, yet when I'm usually experiencing several days in the 100s, we had 1, maybe 2 days in '14. & for the 2nd yr in a row its almost May but instead of the normal 90s we are barely hitting the 80 degree mark
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 10:01 pm
So please, mate, call me a "denier." In fact, I will be disappointed in you if you don't. Yes, I'm the biggest JUNK SCIENCE DENIER around. ;-) If in your game of pigeon chess that represents Check mate, then it's a game I'm PROUD to lose. #WINNINGBYLOSING
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:57 pm
But basically you say any interpretation of science you present is BEING DENIED if we disagree with it. Fair enough. I'm a JUNK SCIENCE DENIER. I see your junk science and raise you 10000+ peer reviewed studies and the 97-99% consensus that backs it.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:56 pm
It's point (B) you are refuting. Now with your debunked cosmic ray nonsense. The effectiveness of GCRs in cloud formation has been shown to be dubious. GCRs exert a very tiny influence over low-level cloud cover, not enough to account for sh*t.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:53 pm
But the reason WE KNOW man-made CO2 is causing GW now is because (A) CO2 in theory CAN cause CC (a point you've conceded) and (B) thousands of investigations by reputable scientists and have found the correlation in a myriad of ways that is unequivocal.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:52 pm
Just because man-made CO2 or cosmic rays COULD cause climate change, doesn't mean all climate change is caused by CO2 and cosmic rays. See what I did there? I included CO2 as well.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:50 pm
Sure...if all this happened, it could cause global warming. But there is ZERO evidence that any of this happened. And by pushing it, you are engaging in a causal fallacy. ie.Just because Socrates is a man, doesn't mean all men are Socrates.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:49 pm
In order for GCRs to successfully seed clouds, they must induce aerosol formation which THEN must grow sufficiently through the condensation of gas in our atmosphere to form cloud-condensation nuclei. Then his must lead to increased cloud formation.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:47 pm
FACT- Cosmic ray flux on Earth has been monitored since the 1950s, and has shown ZERO-ZILCH-NADA significant trends over that period. FACT - our global solar magnetic field also has NOT changed appreciably over the past thirty years.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:45 pm
However, it turns out that none of these hypotheticals that Henrik proposed are occurring in reality. For instance, a nuclear winter COULD create global cooling. But that doesn't mean nukes caused the ice age.lol.. What matters is the PRESENT causes NOW
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:39 pm
Hypothetically, an increasing solar magnetic field COULD deflect cosmic rays, which hypothetically seeds low-level clouds, thus decreasing the Earth's reflectivity and causing GW.That's his hypothesis.But is that ACTUALLY happening? Is it the reality now?
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:36 pm
In fact, it's funny, but you are pretty much just copying and pasting what Henrik is saying. I know. I checked. Again, here is the refutation mate--->
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:34 pm
You're simply posting something without demonstrating comprehension of the concepts involved.I gave you the methodology to verify your claims.You ignored it and simply repeated an empirically disproven concept.In other words,you're talking out of your a$s
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:31 pm
Mother nature is not denying the science. You are, denier. There are 4 requirements that must be true for his theory to be valid. They failed to produce results when tested repeatedly against empirical variables. And you are not replying to that.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:28 pm
And that didn't reply at all to the evidence I cited. Just more pigeon chess from you. Yes, you are good at the copy and paste function, mate. Now apply that same vigor to actually learning the science you deny. :-) You might learn something
OTC - April 23, 2015, 9:02 pm
You understand his findinds that when the sun is active, as it has been, it shields us from cosmic rays reducing cloud cover which heats up the planet. with the sun becoming less active, more cosmic rays will produce more clouds
OTC - April 23, 2015, 8:55 pm
The sun is going into a grand minimum, temperatures have flatten recently and scientists are suggesting a cooling period. There's too much invested in the MMGW hype to accept a Global Cooling. Everyone can deny that science, but Mother Nature won't
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:21 pm
It turns out that none of these Hen'schypotheticals are occurring in reality, and if cosmic rays were able to influence global temperatures, they would be having a cooling effect. This IS why he is ignored and why you don't know **** about MMCC.Cheers :-)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:18 pm
In summary,studies have shown that GCRs exert a minor influence over low-level cloud cover,solar magnetic field has not increased in recent decades,nor has GCR flux on Earth decreased.In fact,if GCRs did have a significant impact,cooling wouldve occurred
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:16 pm
3)Cosmic rays must successfully seed low-level clouds.4)Low-level cloud cover must have a long-term negative trend. Fortunately climatology had empirical variables against which they tested these requirements. Study after indie study debunked Hen's theory
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:12 pm
In order for this theory to be plausible, all four of the following requirements must be true.1)Solar magnetic field must have a long-term positive trend.2)Galactic cosmic ray flux on Earth must have a long-term negative trend
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:09 pm
, the Sun can turn the temperature up and down. ... As the Sun’s magnetism doubled in strength during the 20th century, this natural mechanism may be responsible for a large part of global warming seen then." End quack quote. (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:07 pm
Henrik Svensmark says -- It's cosmic rays! The quack says, "When the Sun is active, its magnetic field is better at shielding us against the cosmic rays coming from outer space, before they reach our planet. By regulating the Earth’s cloud cover,(1/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:05 pm
who also say radiation is proof of Jesus's resurrection because they claim it explains away the carbon dating which shows the Shroud of Turin to have originated a few hundred years ago, not 2000 yrs ago. Junk science is real neat, huh? (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:01 pm
He IS ignored because he was proven wrong. PERIOD. He blames everything and I mean EVERYTHING on cosmic rays, including evolution. Congrats! You know how to use Google, mate. ;-) While you at it there you'll find these Russian "scientists" too (1/2)
OTC - April 23, 2015, 5:09 pm
Like Henrik Svensmark who gets ignored because his research didn't coincide with the consensus
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:20 pm
Even so, Michael Crichton's opinion on this means about as much to the CC debate as Steven Spielberg's opinion. ie.Not very much. A poster like this plainly proves the deniers are simply trolling science. It is proof of nothing. 1 Lion
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:18 pm
We are discussing 10000+ studies, reproducible results, in what is called PEER-REVIEW. The consensus vernacular is plainly the "CC for Dummies" explanation for that.It is not meant as a substitute for hard science, which already exists for MMCC(2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:14 pm
Michael Crichton, who is the author of this quote, never did a study on climate change. Nor was he a climatologist. The part you missed, though, was where he says: "what is relevant is reproducible results." Every major CC study has been reproduced(1/2)


TODAY ON GLENN BECK - A special guest: Michael Steele of the Republican National Committee.




MICHAEL MOORE - Crusades against capitalism (while getting rich from capitalism)




NO JUSTICE FOR ARMY SPECIALIST MICHAEL SHARKEY -


TAGS: michael sharkey specialist home stolen
Rating: 4.38/5

More politifakes by foxrecon19d

terroraustralis - April 24, 2014, 2:52 am
exactly. i'd like to see how they react when the owner returns to "liberate" his home. only **** thing is that the media would find some way to twist it and make him look like the bad guy.
Curlyrocks - April 23, 2014, 9:36 pm
So I think him and the men and women he was deployed with need to pay a visit to his home. What are these scum going to do about it?


THE YEAR WAS 1999 - Apparently this didn't hit the news




BLOWHOLE MICHAEL MOORE -




GLOBAL WARMING -




Obama's Detestable Priorities -




liberals answer: "no, and you're a racist" -




Michael Moore -




Gun Grabbing Nuts: A Never-Ending Well Of Stupidity -




Linwood Kaine -




Congrats, Obama & Race-baiting Liberals! -




Very Entertaining -


TAGS: freddie gray protesters baltimore ferguson michael brown liberal cities
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

OTC - April 26, 2015, 11:48 pm
You forgot about the outside agitators


Ferguson Protesters -




New York Times Hypocritical Hack -




Police Lives Matter -




13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi -




Liberal Hypocrite -




Where's The Outrage? -


TAGS: brian moore nypd black lives matter hads up dont shoot freddie gray michael brown ferguson eric garner bill de blasio
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

MMessEnnBeeCee - May 6, 2015, 7:12 pm
What about black cops? Do their lives matter?


Baltimore Riots & Looting -




Liberal Insanity & Hypocrisy -




Biden Sucks A Pacifier & Bloomberg Is Knighted -




George Soros Built That! -




Affirmative Action Leads to this Kind of Outrageous Stupidity & Racism -




Baltimore -




Hands Up, Don't Shoot!!! -




Michael E. Mann: Liar, Cheat, Falsifier, Fraud & Crybaby -




Baltimore Rioters -




MICHAEL BROWN, WHO? -


TAGS: michael brown who
Rating: 4.79/5

More politifakes by foxrecon19d

Reality Lord - November 26, 2014, 6:09 pm

pepperidge farm remembers :)


Finally... -




Jeb Bush Is Pro-Abortion -




American Bad Ass -




A True American Hero Sounds Off -




U.S. Marine Vs. Leftist Coward -




American Sniper -




facts -




Jaywalking -


TAGS: ferguson michael brown police state
Rating: 2.6/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

Cannabal - December 1, 2014, 10:47 pm
The whole world's against me, I swear to God.
Cannabal - December 1, 2014, 10:47 pm
The whole world's against me, I swear to God.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - December 1, 2014, 7:58 pm

Question it all you want, just don't subvert it so that you can swear.
Cannabal - November 30, 2014, 12:37 pm
Do not question the censor. It anger our Fearless Leader, Chairman Moo!
Cyberhagen - November 29, 2014, 12:50 pm
why the f*** is " s h o t " censored? WTF?
Cyberhagen - November 29, 2014, 12:50 pm
Oh yes, definitely. In fact, the tens of violent looters/protesters that have been sh** only prove ...oh wait, that didn't happen.


Innocent Until Proven Guilty -


TAGS: sixth amendment due process ferguson michael brown
Rating: 2.25/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

fauxnews - December 24, 2014, 6:40 pm
NOW you're making things up.X-D Or maybe you really are just dressing up in"armchair internet d'rag."Explains why you won't provide a straight answer to a simple question about being a man or a woman because if you're(in a sense)BOTH,well then...ACES! ;-)
fauxnews - December 24, 2014, 6:30 pm
OTC said "I didn't pretend to be a woman, I simply used a Bill Clinton tactic and mislead" uh, by pretending to be a woman. Duh..lolol..Your excuse as to WHY you did it doesnt change WHAT you did.Backwards logic.But on"Kryptob"that's 'normal'logic,eh?X-D
OTC - December 18, 2014, 9:28 pm
I didn't pretend to be a woman, I simply used a Bill Clinton tactic and mislead
fauxnews - December 18, 2014, 12:57 pm
Joking aside OTC,the cop didnt have to shoot an unarmed man over a petty crime.That's what police training,pepper spray,etc.,is for.He simply lost his temper,let his prejudices get the better of him.That's what some r outraged by.Ok,gotta run.Cheers! :-)
fauxnews - December 18, 2014, 12:49 pm
I hate it when phones do that. :-( Is that what happened the time you were caught pretending to be a woman? ;-) #59471,#59523 It was the 'phone's' fault,right? ;-p Or are you just an "armchair" tr***? nyuk nyuk nyuk X-D Enquiring minds want to know! :-D
OTC - December 18, 2014, 12:45 pm
I'm not the one who said anything about Mormons, you're making up stuff again.
fauxnews - December 18, 2014, 12:39 pm
Ah,Bizarro world!That square,backwards KryptoN in an alternate reality where everything is opposite of what is true.The only place in the universe where cold is h**,square is round,cats chase dogs,hamburgers try to eat people and where OTC makes sense X-D
fauxnews - December 18, 2014, 12:30 pm
Ah, yes, Cannabal....good ole Kryptob, the planetary nursing home where the KryptoNians house all the redneck low IQ conservative KryptoBians. Mormon? Did you too miss the 'r' and hit 'rm' instead of just 'r' on YOUR android phone?X-D tsk Stupid phone :-(
Cannabal - December 17, 2014, 10:12 pm
If only Darrel Wilson ignored Michael Brown's alleged jaywalking, like most police would do. No wait, Michael Brown was a suspect in stealing cigarillos from a gas station he apparently wasn't even at, nor was there any trace of said item on his person.
Cannabal - December 17, 2014, 10:09 pm
You're right, this one--totally Obama's fault. Totally.
OTC - December 17, 2014, 4:08 pm
Too bad Darrell Wilson isn't black and Michael Brown wasn't white, this would have never made the news and Ferguson would have been spared the violence and riots
foxrecon19d - December 17, 2014, 12:45 pm
Too bad Darrel Wilson didn't kill Michael Brown using a drone strike from two miles away without due process of the law because, apparently, as long as Obama is president, then Democrats believe that's a perfectly legal case of self-defense
Cannabal - December 17, 2014, 3:41 am
Whatever the case, Darrel Wilson's argument for self-defense might've held up a bit more if he only fired off two rounds into Michael Brown's torso. The two headsh**s really do make it look like an execution-style shooting, which is to say, it's a murder.
OTC - December 16, 2014, 9:11 pm
So I missed the 'n' and hit the 'b' on this android phone, like you never make a mistake, armchair grammar cop.
Curlyrocks - December 16, 2014, 8:56 pm
So Bizzaro World then.
Cannabal - December 16, 2014, 8:26 pm
Now, Faux, I think you're being a little bit harsh: you see, Kryptob was Krypton's Mormon neighbor.
fauxnews - December 16, 2014, 3:47 pm
Neither is Superman. He is from the planet KryptoN. Word of advice: leave the comedy to the professionals...and the armchair lawyering. Your views on the case are embarrassingly absurd....almost as bad as your jokes.Bizarro Superman might chuckle so ACES!
OTC - December 16, 2014, 12:45 pm
So if someone as big and strong as Brown was hostile and punching you in the face causing tou to get dazed, you wouldn't have any fear or feel threatened. That's nice, but we're not all from the planet Kryptob
Cannabal - December 15, 2014, 3:23 pm
And given the outcome, I still question the details about that very altercation and whether Darrell Wilson's life was facing a clear and present enough danger to warrant the use of lethal force.
OTC - December 15, 2014, 5:29 am
Oh, I thought we were talking about the altercation at the vehicle, my bad
Cannabal - December 15, 2014, 2:25 am
What caliber were those bullets again? Because I don't get how Michael Brown's body was over 100 feet away from the vehicle when it was claimed that it was 35 feet from the vehicle, which is a substantial difference.
Cannabal - December 15, 2014, 2:23 am
Yet another thing a police officer would do: distort testimony.
OTC - December 14, 2014, 11:59 pm
So you're saying it's a bad idea to act hostile towards an officer, interesting.
OTC - December 14, 2014, 11:51 pm
And Wilson isn't right handed, wouldn't carry the sidearm on his right side, and sitting in a vehicle wouldn't have his head turned to the left to talk out the window (exposing the right side of his face)
Cannabal - December 14, 2014, 3:34 pm
Are you familiar with the concept of entrapment? Because that is just the sort of suggestion a law enforcement official would make.
Cannabal - December 14, 2014, 3:33 pm
No, certainly not. Since it was the opposite side of Wilson's face (the right side), Michael Brown would have to Stretch Armstrong.
OTC - December 14, 2014, 7:58 am
I'm guessing you're not gonna try the little experiment I suggested and go harass a cop?
OTC - December 14, 2014, 7:57 am
So you're saying it would take a Hulk Hogan type with special forces training to punch someone in the side of the face?
Cannabal - December 13, 2014, 9:44 pm
Oh, good, because that would make him an unstoppable Hulk Hogan with special forces training. And for all we know, Michael Brown is regenerating as we speak--it's taking so long due to the head sh**s, which cause critical damage as everyone knows.
OTC - December 13, 2014, 7:16 pm
Yeah, that's why i didn't mention the possibility that Brown could have punched him WHILE trying to grab his pistol
Cannabal - December 13, 2014, 5:57 pm
Yeah, man, this whole incident is just way too d'amn confusing.
foxrecon19d - December 13, 2014, 1:09 pm
Implying? Instead of coming out and saying exactly what you mean, you admit to "implying." "...thanks for another peek at that skewed psyche of yours."
foxrecon19d - December 13, 2014, 1:09 pm
Implying? Instead of coming out and saying exactly what you mean, you admit to "implying." "...thanks for another peek at that skewed psyche of yours."
OTC - December 13, 2014, 9:57 am
my bad, I didn't realize the punch could NOT have possibly come before or after trying to grab the sidearm. He must not have tried to rush him either, right? I mean, if he was trying to grab a sidearm, then he would have been too close to rush him
Cannabal - December 13, 2014, 4:15 am
.....Wasn't that left hand busy trying to get a hold of the sidearm?
OTC - December 13, 2014, 12:31 am
That is a mystery, because sitting in the driver seat you can't turn your head far enough to the left to expose the right side of your face, and a right handed person will never ever use the left hand to punch someone
foxrecon19d - December 13, 2014, 12:26 am
Implying? Instead of coming out and saying exactly what you mean, you admit to "implying." "...thanks for another peek at that skewed psyche of yours."
Cannabal - December 12, 2014, 6:20 pm
Zimmerman had mixed-martial arts training, and yet he couldn't defend himself against a 17-year-old male? That's triflin', homes.
Cannabal - December 12, 2014, 6:16 pm
Just like Whitey to play the Race Card.
Cannabal - December 12, 2014, 6:15 pm
Question: how did Darrel Wilson get hit on the right side of his face, leaving a distinct bruise on his right cheek while sitting in the DRIVER side of his vehicle, whilst allegedly being attacked by a RIGHT-HANDED Michael Brown? You know what, forget it.
OTC - December 12, 2014, 4:11 pm
Of cousre, if you're white and harass a black cop, it won't get any media attention
OTC - December 12, 2014, 3:56 pm
Here's an experiment for you bleeding hearts, act hostile towards a cop and try to grab his pistol and see what that gets you
OTC - December 12, 2014, 3:53 pm
Correction crank, skewed psyche of the media
OTC - December 12, 2014, 3:52 pm
You want to "buy" a chance? How much you willing to pay?
OTC - December 12, 2014, 3:50 pm
If you listen to the call and not what the liberal media cut and spliced, when told not to engage, Zimmerman ceased
crankyhead - December 12, 2014, 3:30 pm
That's not what I'm asking or implying fox, but thanks for another peek at that skewed psyche of yours.
foxrecon19d - December 12, 2014, 1:56 pm
Because, as all us good left-wing liberals know, all white guys are racist
Cannabal - December 12, 2014, 1:18 pm
Michael Brown was not engaged in any real criminal activity whatsoever, so Wilson had no genuine probable cause to begin with. And Zimmerman just plain acted like a vigilante when he as told NOT TO ENGAGE with Martin.
crankyhead - December 12, 2014, 1:01 pm
Just out of curiosity OTC, and don't answer if you don't want to, it won't bother me... are you a white guy, buy any chance?
crankyhead - December 12, 2014, 1:00 pm
Last I checked, they made the news because they were sh** dead while unarmed, and the shooter was allowed to walk away without a trial.
OTC - December 12, 2014, 12:30 pm
I've had dealings with officers and not one time did any of them (black or white) pull their pistol and shoot me. oh that's right, I acted civil and polite, not aggressive and hostile
OTC - December 12, 2014, 12:25 pm
Last i checked, Brown and Martin's aggressive actions is why they made the news
Cannabal - December 11, 2014, 3:00 pm
Last I checked, both Wilson and Zimmerman got their day in court, unlike Brown and Martin.
OTC - December 10, 2014, 6:34 pm
Or to Hispanics the media dub as being 'white'?
OTC - December 10, 2014, 6:32 pm
Innocent until proven guilty, guess that doesn't apply to white cops?
Cannabal - December 7, 2014, 8:06 pm
When an officer uses the service sidearm, it is supposed to remain in its respective holster until it is needed for investigation. For some reason, it was placed in an evidence envelope immediately when Wilson went to the station. I wonder why.....
OTC - December 7, 2014, 7:47 pm
Tampered with evidence, that's a good one
Cannabal - December 7, 2014, 2:08 pm
correct link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbRIfHW7IoU
Cannabal - December 7, 2014, 2:05 pm
http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/Eric-Garner-Chokehold-Police-Custody-Cause-of-Death-Staten-Island-Medical-Examiner-269396151.html
Cannabal - December 7, 2014, 2:05 pm
Good point: Wilson tampered with evidence and gave bogus testimony, so I can't blame the grand jury entirely for not indicting him. Then again, I see this happen.
Cannabal - December 7, 2014, 2:01 pm
You know what, Chris Rock is right: Michael Brown should not have walked across the street without a white friend. And since we bringin' up Chris Rock...http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uj0mtxXEGE8&feature=youtu.be
OTC - December 7, 2014, 1:14 pm
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uj0mtxXEGE8&feature=youtu.be
OTC - December 7, 2014, 1:08 pm
Strange indeed, because anything you touch leaves permanent fingerprints, even if someone else grabbed the sidearm afterwards, Brown's prints should have remained
Cannabal - December 6, 2014, 8:19 pm
Y'know the strangest thing about Wilson's testimony: Michael Brown's fingerprints didn't show up on his sidearm at all.
Cyberhagen - December 6, 2014, 1:02 pm
So what's a cop supposed to do when someone twice his size bum rushes him, hits him, resists arrest, and tries to grab his gun? Armchair cops are pathetic.
Cannabal - December 4, 2014, 9:53 pm
What's validating looting now?
Zeitguy - December 4, 2014, 9:43 pm
Validating looting, scary how some people overlook the obvious.
fauxnews - December 3, 2014, 6:29 pm
True. Scary how some people overlook the obvious. Good poster. ACES!


PREV PAGE